Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-common] RFC: spice.proto: add webdav channel

2014-03-17 Thread Alon Levy
On 03/14/2014 06:17 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > If no further comments, can I move ahead adding that new channel? ACK by me. > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:39 PM, David Jaša wrote: >> On Čt, 2014-02-27 at 18:27 +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:00 PM, J

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-common] RFC: spice.proto: add webdav channel

2014-03-14 Thread Marc-André Lureau
If no further comments, can I move ahead adding that new channel? On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:39 PM, David Jaša wrote: > On Čt, 2014-02-27 at 18:27 +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Jonathon Jongsma >> wrote: >> > There's also the option of using a 'tem

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-common] RFC: spice.proto: add webdav channel

2014-02-28 Thread David Jaša
On Čt, 2014-02-27 at 18:27 +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Jonathon Jongsma > wrote: > > There's also the option of using a 'temporary' name (e.g. > > DraftWebDAVChannel or something) until we're convinced that it's the > > right approach and then renam

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-common] RFC: spice.proto: add webdav channel

2014-02-27 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > There's also the option of using a 'temporary' name (e.g. > DraftWebDAVChannel or something) until we're convinced that it's the > right approach and then rename it to a more official name and advertise > it as stable... Imho, we sh

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-common] RFC: spice.proto: add webdav channel

2014-02-26 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
There's also the option of using a 'temporary' name (e.g. DraftWebDAVChannel or something) until we're convinced that it's the right approach and then rename it to a more official name and advertise it as stable... Just an idea. Jonathon On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 17:47 +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrot

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-common] RFC: spice.proto: add webdav channel

2014-02-26 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hey, ping! still looking for review/ack, I would like this webdav channel to be part of the specified protocol. I could do without, and just name a port channel with my own data, but I prefer to have a proper registered channel, so it is documented officially as part of Spice. Although some chan

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-common] RFC: spice.proto: add webdav channel

2014-01-23 Thread Marc-André Lureau
- Original Message - > Hi, > > On Ne, 2014-01-12 at 18:29 +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > This channel provides a webdav server (rfc4918). This allows various > > guest or remote system that support webdav to access a folder shared by > > the client (some agent can be used to proxy t

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-common] RFC: spice.proto: add webdav channel

2014-01-23 Thread David Jaša
Hi, On Ne, 2014-01-12 at 18:29 +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > This channel provides a webdav server (rfc4918). This allows various > guest or remote system that support webdav to access a folder shared by > the client (some agent can be used to proxy the requests on a local port > for example).

[Spice-devel] [PATCH spice-common] RFC: spice.proto: add webdav channel

2014-01-12 Thread Marc-André Lureau
This channel provides a webdav server (rfc4918). This allows various guest or remote system that support webdav to access a folder shared by the client (some agent can be used to proxy the requests on a local port for example). The webdav server may also be accessed by an hypervisor as a remote fil