Re: [Spice-devel] Untested idea: enlarge the TCP send buffer (server), receive buffer (client)

2012-02-14 Thread Alon Levy
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:47:07PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: For both LAN (high bandwidth, high performance) and WAN (high latency) perhaps it may be worthwhile to increase (via socket options) the TCP receive (on the client) and send (on the server) buffers for the display channel? It will

[Spice-devel] Untested idea: enlarge the TCP send buffer (server), receive buffer (client)

2012-02-13 Thread Yaniv Kaul
For both LAN (high bandwidth, high performance) and WAN (high latency) perhaps it may be worthwhile to increase (via socket options) the TCP receive (on the client) and send (on the server) buffers for the display channel? It will cause: - bigger TCP window (which is good for both cases above)

Re: [Spice-devel] Untested idea: enlarge the TCP send buffer (server), receive buffer (client)

2012-02-13 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On 02/13/2012 10:47 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: For both LAN (high bandwidth, high performance) and WAN (high latency) perhaps it may be worthwhile to increase (via socket options) the TCP receive (on the client) and send (on the server) buffers for the display channel? It will cause: - bigger TCP

Re: [Spice-devel] Untested idea: enlarge the TCP send buffer (server), receive buffer (client)

2012-02-13 Thread Yonit Halperin
On 02/13/2012 10:47 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: For both LAN (high bandwidth, high performance) and WAN (high latency) perhaps it may be worthwhile to increase (via socket options) the TCP receive (on the client) and send (on the server) buffers for the display channel? It will cause: - bigger TCP