On 01/15/2012 10:40 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On 01/15/2012 10:13 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
SNIP
BTW, Yaniv, can you update the wireshark dissector to handle the new
protocol?
Yonit.
Already on it, hopefully patch will be ready by the end of the week.
Hi,
On 01/13/2012 02:17 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/13/2012 12:17 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 05:52:15PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
While looking at spice-protocol git, to see if we should
do a spice-protocol-0.10.1 too, I noticed a few
unregularities:
1) the
On 01/15/2012 10:13 AM, Yonit Halperin wrote:
SNIP
BTW, Yaniv, can you update the wireshark dissector to handle the new
protocol?
Yonit.
Already on it, hopefully patch will be ready by the end of the week.
I'm not sure the capability exchange was done in the spirit of the
protocol (I
Hi,
On 01/13/2012 12:17 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 05:52:15PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
While looking at spice-protocol git, to see if we should
do a spice-protocol-0.10.1 too, I noticed a few
unregularities:
1) the 0.10 branch has a commit from Alon called:
add opus
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:17:26PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/13/2012 12:17 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 05:52:15PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
While looking at spice-protocol git, to see if we should
do a spice-protocol-0.10.1 too, I noticed a few
Hi,
While looking at spice-protocol git, to see if we should
do a spice-protocol-0.10.1 too, I noticed a few
unregularities:
1) the 0.10 branch has a commit from Alon called:
add opus playback and record cap, which is not on
master
2) master has a commit titled:
Release 0.10.1, but no 0.10.1
