Hah!
Got me!!!
Carter
--- Michael Hargreave Mawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Carter
> Shore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >Next I suppose that they will attempt to regulate
> CO2
> >emission from breathing.
> >
> >With all due respect, the lady sponsoring
ias must affect them. And don't they
have lobbiests?
Laura G.
>From: Michael Hargreave Mawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Michael Hargreave Mawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: To Californiaians - [Fwd: CA CO2 regulation / AB 1058 / Apri
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carter
Shore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Next I suppose that they will attempt to regulate CO2
>emission from breathing.
>
>With all due respect, the lady sponsoring this bill
>sounds like a real wack job.
Check the date of the Bill in the subject header...
ATB
Next I suppose that they will attempt to regulate CO2
emission from breathing.
With all due respect, the lady sponsoring this bill
sounds like a real wack job.
Carter Shore
> ... With AB-1058,
> the legislation targets
> carbon dioxide emitted by the state's 23 million
> passenger vehicles. Fra
Thought this might be of interest to you.
John
-
>Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 01:34:16 -0500
>From: Stella Pyrtek-Blond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Fwd: CA CO2 regulation / AB 1058 / April 1, 2002]
FYI: Sources say this bill is coming up on Monday in the California
legislature.
I wrote
