Re: [spring] [Idr] Comments on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-01

2015-11-16 Thread Eric C Rosen
On 11/10/2015 3:00 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: I agree the predominant use case will be advertisement of a loopback. However, independent of whether or not the Originator-SRGB TLV is included, I see no reason why a BGP Speaker could not associate a label-index with a locally attached subnet.

Re: [spring] [Idr] Comments on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-01

2015-11-16 Thread Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
> On Nov 16, 2015, at 3:44 PM, Eric C Rosen wrote: > > On 11/10/2015 3:00 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> I agree the predominant use case will be advertisement of a loopback. >> However, independent of whether or not the Originator-SRGB TLV is >> included, I see no reason