Bruno -
After rereading your post, I think I missed part of what you were trying to say.
Topology was introduced because it is expected (indeed even REQUIRED) that the
same prefix would have a different SID in different topologies. This is why for
the purposes of determining "prefix conflict"
Tal,
> [Apologies if this issue has been discussed before.]
>
> According to draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header, an ‘SR Segment Endpoint
> Node’ updates the Destination IP address.
> Therefore, it must also update the Layer 4 Checksum, right?
>
> I wonder if there is an upper bound on the
Hi,
[Apologies if this issue has been discussed before.]
According to draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header, an 'SR Segment Endpoint
Node' updates the Destination IP address.
Therefore, it must also update the Layer 4 Checksum, right?
I wonder if there is an upper bound on the size of the
