Bruno -
Inline.
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 5:10 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution
Hi Les,
Thanks for the discussion. Please see inline [Bruno]
From: Les
Bruno -
I don't find your representation complete as regards all of the attributes
which are proposed to be used by the conflict resolution algorithm - so it is
therefore hard for me to use/understand this representation when applying the
defined preference rule.
This is true for me even after
Hi Les,
Thanks for the discussion. Please see inline [Bruno]
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 6:19 PM
To: DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution
Bruno -
From:
Hi Les,
Administrative distance (protocol preference) has always been used in router
implementation for a while. Yes inconsistent configuration of admin distance
can cause routing issues (loops or whatever ...). I'm not sure we can really
bypass it ...
Regarding the preference algorithm, the
