Re: [spring] IPR Poll for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming

2019-03-18 Thread Linda Dunbar
Support, Linda Dunbar On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:50 AM mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> wrote: Hi authors, SPRING WG, In parallel to the call for adoption for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming (1), we would like to poll for IPR. If you are aware of IPR that applies to

Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming

2019-03-18 Thread John Leddy
I support the working group adoption of this document. John Leddy > >> On Mar 13, 2019, at 7:49 PM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote: >> >> Hi SPRING WG, >> >> This email initiates a three week call for working group adoption for >> draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming. (Three weeks

Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming

2019-03-18 Thread stefano previdi
Hi, I support the working group adoption of this document. Thanks. s. > On Mar 13, 2019, at 7:49 PM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote: > > Hi SPRING WG, > > This email initiates a three week call for working group adoption for > draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming. (Three weeks

Re: [spring] IPR Poll for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming

2019-03-18 Thread Darren Dukes (ddukes)
I am not aware of any IPR other than the one already disclosed. From: spring on behalf of Date: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 2:50 PM To: SPRING WG Cc: "draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf.org" Subject: [spring] IPR Poll for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming Hi

Re: [spring] IPR Poll for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming

2019-03-18 Thread Robert Raszuk
Hi Joel, The way I would handle it is to proceed with the current document in SPRING and use it as indicator of benefits while in the same time issue a new draft in 6man updating RFC8200 not by duplicating this draft, but using it as justification for the update. Going now to 6man with

Re: [spring] IETF 104 - SPRING meeting

2019-03-18 Thread bruno.decraene
Linda, Sorry, the agenda has already been published and is full/oversubscribed. You are welcome to introduce your draft on the mailing list, in order to raise awareness and quick off discussions . Thanks you, --Bruno -Original Message- From: Linda Dunbar

Re: [spring] IPR Poll for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming

2019-03-18 Thread Joel M. Halpern
Robert, your description of the conflict situation does not match my understanding. A new rFC can always update existing RFCs. However, it can't do so silently. If this document wants to make a change to 8200's rules, it needs to say so. And explain the benefit. And have the proposal