Hi Bruno,
I read the updated draft, draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment-00, and
feel it is not your suggested direction, but the opposite one.
You suggested "Re-use the existing SR-policy framework as much as possible"
But the updated document does not re-use the existing SR-policy.
Hi,
I am not aware of any IPRs related to this draft.
Thanks,
--Jayant
From: spring on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 9:04 AM
To: draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segm...@ietf.org
Cc: spring
Subject: [EXT][spring]
I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR that related to this document.
Regards,
Tarek
From: spring on behalf of "bruno.decra...@orange.com"
Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 12:04 PM
To: "draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segm...@ietf.org"
Cc: spring
Subject: [spring] IPR Poll:
Linda,
Ø I requested a presentation slot on Oct 29 (see the attached email), is it
neglect or intentional of not having it on the SPRING agenda?
I've replied to your request. In case the email did not reached you, please
find a copy enclosed.
--Bruno
From: Linda Dunbar
Bruno, and Peng ShuPing,
I requested a presentation slot on Oct 29 (see the attached email), is it
neglect or intentional of not having it on the SPRING agenda?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-sr-sdwan-over-hybrid-networks/
Speaker: Linda Dunbar
Possible to add it to Thursday
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this draft
Cheers,
Clarence
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 18:04
To: draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segm...@ietf.org
Cc: spring
Subject: IPR Poll: draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment
Hi Authors,
