Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2020-07-27 Thread lic...@chinatelecom.cn
Hi WG, I support the adoption. It is a useful enhancement to SR, which can help to provide network SLA assurance for various services. Best regards, Cong Li From: James Guichard Date: 2020-07-15 19:16 To: spring@ietf.org CC: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for dra

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2020-07-27 Thread ma...@chinatelecom.cn
Dear WG: I support the adoption. The mechanism in this document could be helpful to deploy services with guaranteed SLA in SR network. Best regards, Chenhao From: James Guichard Date: 2020-07-15 19:16 To: spring@ietf.org CC: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang

2020-07-27 Thread Kamran Raza (skraza)
Thanks Dhruv, Jeff, and Yingzhen for your comments. The next rev of the model will take care of NMDA style as well as simplify the grouping. On 2020-07-25, 7:53 PM, "spring on behalf of Yingzhen Qu" wrote: Hi, I agree with Dhruv's comments that there should not be separate configur

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang

2020-07-27 Thread Kamran Raza (skraza)
Thanks Dhuruv for your support and useful review/comments. We will discuss within authors and incorporate comments accordingly. On 2020-07-25, 1:20 PM, "spring on behalf of Dhruv Dhody" wrote: Hi WG, I support the adoption of this work and I have thoughts on how to improve the do

Re: [spring] draft-gandhi-spring-sr-enhanced-plm / draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm

2020-07-27 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi Thomas, Please see replies inline with … From: Date: Monday, July 27, 2020 at 8:49 AM To: "=SMTP:rgandhi@cisco. com" Cc: Subject: draft-gandhi-spring-sr-enhanced-plm / draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm Hi Rakesh, Thanks for the presentations at spring wg. For clarification, I assume th

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang

2020-07-27 Thread Sonal Agarwal
Hi WG, I support adoption of this draft. Regards, Sonal. > On Jul 14, 2020, at 11:38 PM, Kamran Raza (skraza) > wrote: > >  > I support the adoption of this draft. > > Rgds, > - > Kamran > > From: spring on behalf of James Guichard > > Date: Monday, July 13, 2020 at 11:39 AM > To: "sp

Re: [spring] Meetecho abrupt termination of meeting

2020-07-27 Thread Jay Daley
Stewart This was unexpected and is being investigated. Jay > On 28/07/2020, at 12:48 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > Is it really necessary for Meetecho to abruptly, and without prior que, > terminate at the end of the scheduled time? > > This is not a behaviour in real meetings nor with “norm

[spring] draft-gandhi-spring-sr-enhanced-plm / draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm

2020-07-27 Thread Thomas.Graf
Hi Rakesh, Thanks for the presentations at spring wg. For clarification, I assume that the controller will be able to orchestrate and collect the results of the STAMP probes with netconf-yang/yang push based on draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-yang. Correct? If yes, I assume that the STAMP extensions

[spring] Meetecho abrupt termination of meeting

2020-07-27 Thread Stewart Bryant
Is it really necessary for Meetecho to abruptly, and without prior que, terminate at the end of the scheduled time? This is not a behaviour in real meetings nor with “normal” telemeeting services. In SPRING the last speaker was cut off mid sentence. I do not find this an acceptable tool for us

[spring] Questions/comments for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang

2020-07-27 Thread Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Hi Authors, Any thoughts/comments for the below? Thanks again, Andrew From: spring on behalf of "Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" Date: Monday, July 13, 2020 at 3:11 PM To: "spring@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang Hello authors. I have

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang

2020-07-27 Thread Richard Vallee (rvallee)
Hello WG, I support the WG adoption of this important work for SRv6. Thanks Richard From: spring on behalf of James Guichard Date: Monday, July 13, 2020 at 5:52 PM To: "spring@ietf.org" Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang Dear WG:

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang

2020-07-27 Thread Richard Vallee (rvallee)
Hello everyone, I support the WG adoption of this important work for SR Policy. Thanks Richard From: spring on behalf of James Guichard Date: Monday, July 13, 2020 at 11:39 AM To: "spring@ietf.org" Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-pol

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2020-07-27 Thread Stewart Bryant
As an author I think this is a useful text to publish in support of this work that continues in TEAS. I hope that the WG is able to accept it as a SPRING WG draft. Stewart > On 15 Jul 2020, at 12:16, James Guichard > wrote: > > Dear WG: > > This email begins a 2 week WG adoption call for

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2020-07-27 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi Jim, I've been working on the Enhanced VPN framework in TEAS and I consider it a good foundation for providing a more sophisticated VPN service that also addresses the needs of network slicing. So I'm pleased to see this work being examined in SPRING. It's been a while since I read this

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2020-07-27 Thread Luis M. Contreras
Hi all, Yes, I support the adoption. The document is in a good shape. I would suggest however to include some hints about the kind of resources considered so far (by now there is an example considering bandwidth; I guess other kind of resources could represent further complexity). Thanks Luis E