Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-01-30 Thread Dongjie (Jimmy)
Hi Robert, Thanks for explaining your comments further. We will revise the descriptions about RSVP-TE [RFC3209] to make this clear. Best regards, Jie From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 8:46 AM To: Adrian Farrel Cc: James Guic

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-01-30 Thread Robert Raszuk
Hi Adrian, Just to make sure my point was correctly understood ... I am not questioning if either data plane or control plane resource reservations should or should not be done for SR. What I am questioning is that the draft says: When compared with RSVP-TE [RFC3209], SR currently does not

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn

2021-01-30 Thread Adrian Farrel
Thanks, Jim, I've been following the enhanced VPN work in TEAS and I see it as a key piece of the network slicing work. It's time that we had some protocol solutions that serve the VPN framework, and this is a suitable starting point. I like that it is not specifying additional protocol wid