Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

Hi Boris, Thanks for your review and feedback. Did you imply that we add an implementation status section in the draft? Or are you suggesting that the chairs poll for implementation and deployment status? I ask because the Implementation Status section is generally removed before publication a

Re: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-10.txt

Hello All, This is mainly a refresh but also fixes editorial nits, updates references and fixes a minor correction in the IANA section. Thanks, Ketan -Original Message- From: spring On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 28 April 2021 10:30 To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org Cc: spring@iet

Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

Hi Pablo, Thank for your review and we've just posted an update that addresses the IANA changes pointed out by you. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-10.txt Thanks, Ketan From: spring On Behalf Of Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) Sent: 27 April 2021 18:06 To:

[spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy-10.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking WG of the IETF. Title : Segment Routing Policy Architecture Authors : Clarence Filsfils

[spring] 答复: DetNet data plane: some questions/comments about draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Janos, Balazs and DetNet, To Janos, thank you for clarifications on Segment Routing from DetNet’s perspective. I agree if SRv6 is going to be used for DetNet purpose, it should follow RFC8655. Actually I am not one of the authors of draft-geng-detnet-dp-solv-srv6, just personally interested i

Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

Hi James and all, I read the draft and strongly support its publication as WG document. Very detailed, helpful and interesting document.I would only add implementation status part because currently it is not easy to get such info about implementation details. Thank you. SY,Boris On Thursd

Re: [spring] DetNet data plane: some questions/comments about draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Fan, Please find some comments related to the sub-layer violation in-line. 1, (Sub-)layer violation: The draft is referring DetNet documents (RFC8655, RFC8964) and explicitly the PREOF functionality. There seems to be a (sub-)layer violation caused by this draft. In DetNet PREOF belongs to t

Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

Hi, I've read the latest revision of this document and I believe it's ready for publication. This is an important draft, implemented by multiple vendors and deployed. Minor nit: The IANA considerations request the creation of a new top-level registry "Segment Routing Parameters", and a new sub-

Re: [spring] DetNet data plane: some questions/comments about draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Fan, Thanks for the clarifications and resolving the RFC8964 conflict. >> I’m afraid it is actually not the gap between redundancy >> protection and DetNet PRF/PEF, but the one between >> DetNet MPLS and DetNet SR-MPLS. Do I understand it correctly that You intend to define a new data plane fo

Re: [spring] A possible additional topic for the discussion by the MPLS Open DT.

Greg, Sure, just prepare a detailed walk through, discussing what is new, what is different, what the architectural implications are, backwards compatibility, etc. /Loa On 27/04/2021 05:11, gregory.mir...@ztetx.com wrote: Hi Loa, thank you for your kind offer. Would posting the draft by We