> Robert, why would we discard information?
I view support of all normative MUSTs as something necessary to claim (full
or partial) support of a given draft.
No support of even a single MUST makes an implementation not something
which should be part of a given spec. Discard was about the comment
Robert, why would we discard information? It seems that if folks do
report such partial compliance, it is helpful to include it. Whether
anyone will make such a report remains to be seen.
Yours,
Joel
On 8/13/2022 1:56 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Hi Jeff,
> I’d expect to see all and each MUST
Hi Jeff,
> I’d expect to see all and each MUST statements implemented for an
> implementation to be able to claim to be 100% compliant with the
specification.
Glad we agree on that.
But my point was not so much to claim 100% compliance or 90% compliance. My
point was that any report which indica
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking WG of the
IETF.
Title : Path Segment for SRv6 (Segment Routing in IPv6)
Authors : Cheng Li
