Re: [spring] Intended status of draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments

Hi Gyan, Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this document. I agree with you that in this document the semantics of the existing SR SIDs (the topological SIDs in your text) are extended to “topology/function + resource”, thus the forwarding behavior of the resource-aware SIDs will be a little

Re: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

Hi Joel, I have reviewed the latest version of this document and found it in a good shape, it describes a fundamental mechanism of SRv6, which has become popular in many SRv6 deployments, thus I support its publication. Best regards, Jie From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf

Re: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

Hi WG， I reviewed the draft and support the publication of this document. Best Regards， Ran Original From: JoelHalpern To: SPRING WG List ; Date: 2024年01月22日 22:28 Subject: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression __

Re: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

Dear Spring, I reviewed and support the publication of this document. With RFC 9487 we defined all the necessary IPFIX entities to successfully decode compressed-SID containers at the data collection. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9487#name-compressed-srv6-segment-lis https://datatra

Re: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

Hi ietf, I am from Rakuten Mobile group and I support this draft as this offers more optimal way to encode same amount of information thus less overhead. CSID based SRv6 infra is already configured in Rakuten network on 14k+ devices, 70% services running using this infra successfully. Industr

Re: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

Hi, I support the publication of this document. Thanks, Mengxiao From: spring On Behalf Of Joel Halpern Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 10:28 PM To: SPRING WG List Subject: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression (One of the other chairs pointed out tha

[spring] Fw: [Bof-srv6ops] New Non-WG Mailing List: bof-srv6ops (BoF-SRv6-Operations)

Dear all, We would like to inform you that we have submitted an SRv6 Operation BoF request. The IESG has already conducted the initial BoF discussion call, and the SRv6 BoF has received provisional approval. The BoF request is here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bofreq-liu-srv6-operations/

Re: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

Support. Thx, R. On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 3:28 PM Joel Halpern wrote: > (One of the other chairs pointed out that this had not gone to the list. > So forwarding the announcement.) > > This tarts the WG last call on the above document. > > Thank you, > > Joel > > > Forwarded Message

Re: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

Hi, Joel, I support the publication of this draft. Over time, I have noted that the relevant technical draft has undergone thorough discussions and improvements. I believe this is a step in the right direction, as a standardized CSID would have profound implications for the telecommunicat

Re: [spring] [EXTERNAL] Re: Intended status of draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments

Gyan, and all, I have re-read the draft, but I did not find any proposals for “a new resource attributes extension encoding to existing topological SIDs”. The draft explicitly states that it does not involve an