Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

nd faulty node happens to be doing what you hoped it might and forwarding “works”. But there is no way for you to know what faulty node is actually doing. So all this speculation about which choice might result in the “best behavior” is like playing the lottery. Why would we want to do

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution: SRGB INCONSISTENCY

bout inconsistency in the SRGB ranges advertised by _one_ node. I’m not sure to see your “startup scenario” nor the “merge network scenario”. Could you please elaborate? Thanks, Bruno From: Henderickx, Wim (Wim) [mailto:wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016

Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-bowers-spring-adv-per-algorithm-label-blocks-02.txt

I also don’t see the big value add on this draft from what we have. Given it introduces backward compatibility issues from existing implementation/deployments I don’t see why we should proceed with this work in the WG. On 09/11/15 10:11, "spring on behalf of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)"

Re: [spring] [mpls] working group adoption call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop

Support and not aware of IPR related to this draft On 22/07/15 15:17, "mpls on behalf of John G.Scudder" wrote: >Dear WG, > >As we discussed at our meeting yesterday, working group adoption has been >requested for

Re: [spring] Modeling SRGB configuration for draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang

I tend to agree that proposal 2 is for migration, so would vote for option 2. From: spring on behalf of Pushpasis Sarkar Date: Friday 31 July 2015 07:37 To: Stephane Litkowski, spring@ietf.orgmailto:spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] Modeling SRGB configuration for draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang

Re: [spring] working group adoption call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-central-epe

support On 22/07/15 15:15, spring on behalf of John G.Scudder spring-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of j...@juniper.net wrote: Dear WG, As we discussed at our meeting yesterday, working group adoption has been requested for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-central-epe. Please reply to

Re: [spring] Regarding SID/Lable distributed by IGPs

In the OSPF/ISIS drafts on SR we scoped an algorithm field which could be used for this purpose. So besides shortest path you could use a different algorithm. From: Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem veerendranath...@huawei.commailto:veerendranath...@huawei.com Date: Sunday 28 September 2014 08:15 To:

Re: [spring] Regarding SID/Lable distributed by IGPs

let me know if my understanding is wrong . Whether we can use multiple algorithms to represent same Node SID ? Regards, Veerendranath From: Henderickx, Wim (Wim) [mailto:wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com] Sent: 28 September 2014 14:29 To: Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem; spring@ietf.orgmailto:spring

Re: [spring] Regarding SID/Lable distributed by IGPs

, Veerendranath From: Henderickx, Wim (Wim) [mailto:wim.henderi...@alcatel-lucent.com] Sent: 28 September 2014 14:53 To: Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem; spring@ietf.orgmailto:spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] Regarding SID/Lable distributed by IGPs At this stage we defined the solution such that a given

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-mpls

I support adoption as a co-author. The document is complete to be adopted as WG doc From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) aret...@cisco.commailto:aret...@cisco.com Date: Wednesday 24 September 2014 15:07 To: spring@ietf.orgmailto:spring@ietf.org spring@ietf.orgmailto:spring@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [spring] IPR Claims related to draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-mpls

I’m not aware of undisclosed IPR. From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) aret...@cisco.commailto:aret...@cisco.com Date: Wednesday 24 September 2014 15:07 To: draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-m...@tools.ietf.orgmailto:draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-m...@tools.ietf.org

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing

I support adopting the draft as co-author. The draft describes the architecture well From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) aret...@cisco.commailto:aret...@cisco.com Date: Wednesday 24 September 2014 15:01 To: spring@ietf.orgmailto:spring@ietf.org spring@ietf.orgmailto:spring@ietf.org Cc: