Hi Barry,
At 12:35 PM 02-03-2020, Barry Leiba wrote:
- We need to just let this stuff go and not worry about it.
Thanks. I was a bit worried about whether the old statement was
still applicable.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
___
spring mailing list
hat the persons who participated in the discussions would say.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
been modified,
changed or falsified."
From what I understand, the IESG position on automated disclaimers
was that they are not applicable within the context of BCP 9. Was
there a change to that?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
At 10:06 AM 02-03-2020, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
Dear S
Dear Mr Decraene,
At 09:14 AM 02-03-2020, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
On my side, the header from your email is the following:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: S Moonesamy [mailto:sm+i...@elandsys.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 8:53 PM
> > To
)
I sent an email to the Working Group Chairs. That email was copied
to spring@ietf.org.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
he general practice, in such a
situation, is recusal. I'll invite the
Responsible Area Director to comment about
whether there should be an exception to that practice and the rationale for it.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/spring/about/
2. https:/
amming and listed as a
Contributor of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming. Based on
that, I unfortunately have to disagree with your assessment on
whether there would be a potential conflict of interest.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg
Hi Carlos, Jeff,
Thanks for the comments.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
as "not accepted" is inaccurate.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/spring/about/
2. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/or8086G4iYfee5_Icw4PnhkPLBo/
3. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5933
___
spring mail
side on the mailing list). Please help me
understand your root concern.
My question was about when the the Working Group Last Call ends. I
don't view it as appropriate to determine whether the document should
advance faster or slower as I am not responsible to make such a determination.
eep packet inspection?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
ed if this is not the case."
Where does the 2 or 4 come from? Is the draft trying to specify that
the compressed routing header is malformed if the attribute value is
not 2 or 4?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf
12 matches
Mail list logo
