Dear All,
I strongly support the standardization of a single data plane solution that
supports Segment Routing using also compressed SIDs in an IPv6 network.
Regards,
Greg Mirsky
Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D
Instit
Hi Stewart,
I agree with your examples that PCE and RSVP label distribution mechanisms
allow egress to deduce the identity of the ingress LER. In MPLS-TP, as I
recall, label merge and PHP are prohibited, and that also allows the egress to
"know" the particular ingress LER based on the ToS label
Hi Fan,
thank you for the detailed explanation of the author's view of the scope of the
draft. As the proposed mechanism is being positioned as a generic for SRv6, it
seems logical that it addresses all the use cases. That, in my opinion, would
include p2p and p2mp SR policies and DetNet in SR
Dear WG Chairs, Martin, and All,
as I recall it, the document that was called for the adoption was on the
Informational track. I was quite surprised that the authors switched that to
the Standards track in -07. But that is not what the WG discussed, and, in my
opinion, that may be a violation o
Hi Rakesh,
thank you for sharing your thoughts on the loopback mode. Please find my notes
in-lined in your last mail under GIM>> tags.
Regards,
Greg Mirsky
Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D
Institute/Wireline Product Operation Divisio
Hi Rakesh,
I'm top-posting to share my understanding of why
draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo is on the Standards track. As you've noted,
draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo describes the use of BFD Echo between a BFD
system and a system that might not support BFD. But RFC 5880 excludes such use
ca
Hi Rakesh,
thank you for your consideration. Please find my follow-up notes in-lined under
the GIM2>> tag.
Regards,
Greg Mirsky
Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D
Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division
E: gregory.mir...@ztetx.co
Hi Rakesh,
thank you for responding to my comments. I've added follow-up notes in-line
tagged GIM>>.
Regards,
Greg Mirsky
Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D
Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division
E: gregory.mir...@ztetx.com
www.
Dear Authors, et al.,
I've read the draft. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of comments
from earlier discussions. The document is well-written and I agree with it
being on the Informational track. I've several questions and much appreciate it
if you help me to understand.
In the examp
Hi Jim,
thank you for your kind consideration of my comments. Please find my notes
in-line below under the GIM>> tag.
Regards,
Greg Mirsky
Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D
Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division
Hi Loa,
thank you for your kind offer. Would posting the draft by Wednesday, before the
meeting on Thursday be acceptable?
Regards,
Greg Mirsky
Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D
Institute/Wireline Product Operation Div
11 matches
Mail list logo