:33 PM
> *To:* Shraddha Hegde
> *Cc:* Stefano Previdi (sprevidi); spring@ietf.org; Gulko, Arkadiy
> (Financial&Risk)
>
> *Subject:* Re: [spring] New Version Notification for
> draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00.txt
>
>
>
> Hi Shraddha,
>
>
&g
: Pushpasis Sarkar [mailto:pushpasis.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 1:33 PM
To: Shraddha Hegde
Cc: Stefano Previdi (sprevidi); spring@ietf.org; Gulko, Arkadiy (Financial&Risk)
Subject: Re: [spring] New Version Notification for
draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00.txt
Hi Shraddha,
hpasis
> Rgds
> Shraddha
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) [mailto:sprev...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 1:42 PM
> To: Pushpasis Sarkar
> Cc: Shraddha Hegde ; spring@ietf.org;
> arkadiy.gu...@thomsonreuters.com
> Sub
evidi) [mailto:sprev...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 1:42 PM
To: Pushpasis Sarkar
Cc: Shraddha Hegde ; spring@ietf.org;
arkadiy.gu...@thomsonreuters.com
Subject: Re: [spring] New Version Notification for
draft-gulkohegde-routing-planes-using-sr-00.txt
Hi Pushpasis,
I agree. The pr
Hi Pushpasis,
I agree. The problem/use-case is already described in RFC7855, the required
protocol extensions are already documented in ospf, isis and bgp drafts, we
already have multiple implementations, and deployments have been done.
s.
> On Mar 14, 2017, at 8:20 AM, Pushpasis Sarkar
> w
