Hi Stefano,
Yes, thanks for your reply.
Regards,
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: stefano previdi [mailto:stef...@previdi.net]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 3:06 PM
To: Chengli (IP Technology Research)
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-pol...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-idr-segment-rout
:52 PM
To: stefano previdi ; Chengli (IP Technology Research)
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-pol...@ietf.org; SPRING WG List
; draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-pol...@ietf.org; Lizhenbin
; i...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [spring] Question: Inconsistency of SR policy structure
+1
The draft
> On Oct 19, 2018, at 9:00 AM, Chengli (IP Technology Research)
> wrote:
>
> Hi Stefano,
>
> Please see line.
>
> Cheng
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: stefano previdi [mailto:stef...@previdi.net]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 2:49 PM
> To: Chengli (IP Technology Research)
>
Hi Stefano,
Please see line.
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: stefano previdi [mailto:stef...@previdi.net]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 2:49 PM
To: Chengli (IP Technology Research)
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-pol...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-pol...@ietf.o
Technology Research)
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-pol...@ietf.org; SPRING WG List
; draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-pol...@ietf.org; Robin
Subject: Re: [spring] Question: Inconsistency of SR policy structure
Hi Cheng,
to my understanding the definition of an SR Policy
(draft-ietf
Hi Cheng,
to my understanding the definition of an SR Policy
(draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy) is correct.
An SR Policy may include different paths and each of these paths may be
advertised in a different way (BGP, PCEP, static, ...).
BGP extensions described in draft-ietf-idr-segment
Hi authors,
I am working on updating drafts of path segment extensions in BGP/BGP-LS:
*
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-distribution-00
*
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-00
But I found the inconsistency of
