On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:25 AM, wrote:
>
>
> > Authors: In parallel with the WGLC, please respond to this message
> (making sure you cc
> > spring@ietf.org) and indicate if you are aware of any relevant IPR.
> Please do this even if it
> > has been previously disclosed. Thanks.
>
> IINM, we ar
> On Sep 26, 2016, at 10:25 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi Authors,
>
>> From: John G. Scudder [mailto:j...@juniper.net] > Sent: Tuesday, July 12,
>> 2016 4:44 PM
>>
>> Dear SPRING WG (and I've taken the liberty of cc'ing RTGWG),
>>
>> The authors have indicated that draft-ietf-
Hi Authors,
> From: John G. Scudder [mailto:j...@juniper.net] > Sent: Tuesday, July 12,
> 2016 4:44 PM
>
> Dear SPRING WG (and I've taken the liberty of cc'ing RTGWG),
>
> The authors have indicated that draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases is
> ready for WGLC.
> Please send your comme
John,
I'm not aware of non-disclosed IPR on this use-cases/requirements document.
Thanks
-- Bruno
> -Original Message-
> From: John G. Scudder [mailto:j...@juniper.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 4:44 PM
> To: spring@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-ca...@ietf.org
> Cc: rt
Dear SPRING WG (and I've taken the liberty of cc'ing RTGWG),
The authors have indicated that draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases is ready
for WGLC. Please send your comments to spring@ietf.org. We will plan to end the
WGLC on July 31. I notice that there is an outstanding question from Alexan
