Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law - non-technical side note

2019-09-07 Thread Tom Herbert
ber 6, 2019 at 5:07 AM > To: Alexandre Petrescu > Cc: Fernando Gont , 6man WG , > "spring@ietf.org" > Subject: Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law - non-technical side note > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > This is really spot on and very brilliant su

Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law - non-technical side note

2019-09-07 Thread Zafar Ali (zali)
Thanks Regards … Zafar From: ipv6 on behalf of Robert Raszuk Date: Friday, September 6, 2019 at 5:07 AM To: Alexandre Petrescu Cc: Fernando Gont , 6man WG , "spring@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law - non-technical side note Hi Alex, This is really s

Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law - non-technical side note

2019-09-06 Thread Robert Raszuk
Hi Alex, This is really spot on and very brilliant summary of the state we are in ! And since last 25 years rather proved that the first options is not working the choice seems pretty clear that we should rather choose the second one. Best, R. On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:57 AM Alexandre Petrescu

Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law - non-technical side note

2019-09-06 Thread Alexandre Petrescu
This is a non-technical side note about the Spirit and Letter of the Law in IPv6 WG. In these discussions about IPv6 like routing header, insertion, mutability, 64bit, limited domains, multihoming, smart end dumb network, and numerous other 'tussles', one is supposed to take a side among one of