Hi Alex, This is really spot on and very brilliant summary of the state we are in !
And since last 25 years rather proved that the first options is not working the choice seems pretty clear that we should rather choose the second one. Best, R. On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:57 AM Alexandre Petrescu < alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is a non-technical side note about the Spirit and Letter of the Law > in IPv6 WG. > > In these discussions about IPv6 like routing header, insertion, > mutability, 64bit, limited domains, multihoming, smart end dumb network, > and numerous other 'tussles', one is supposed to take a side among one > of those two: > > - maintain rock solid principles, continue the tradition, keep it up > working as it was designed to and that demonstrated its validity on very > large scale. > > - break away from tradition, foster innovation, things will work anyways > because humans engineer them and market regulates them. > > Only deep convictions about one of those two sides can make IPv6 > deployment and development progress. > > On my side, I cant make have such deep convictions. > > Alex >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
