> >>> running fine. i.e. conflict entries is not the nominal behavior in the
> >>> network, and conflict are detected and reported to the network operator
> >>> for
> >>> correction. (e.g. via the yang model, syslog, error message on the
> >>
n the
>>> individual (mapping server). In this assumption where a single node is
>>> misconfigured, preference many advertisement over a single one, maximize
>>> the number of valid advertisement kept. I agree that this is dependent on
>>> the assumption, and an
y to control SID renumbering (e.g. in
> > case of network merge). cf Stéphane email. Putting this preference lower
> > (e.g. after preferring the larger range) would somewhat defeat the goal or
> > make it less predictable for people.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -
essage-
>> From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Horneffer
>> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 10:59 AM
>> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org
>> Cc: Horneffer, Martin
>> Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution - Preference
; To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org
> Cc: Horneffer, Martin
> Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution - Preference Rule
>
> Hi Les,
>
> this topic, and this document is in my eyes a very important one. Thanks
> a lot for writing and promoting it!
>
Hi Les,
this topic, and this document is in my eyes a very important one. Thanks
a lot for writing and promoting it!
During the Berlin WG session you proposed a new preference rule which
would make the policy choice easier. You asked for a discussion on the
list - more on your slides rather
