10 x 10 = 100 sqft/sprinkler x .6 = 60 gpm/sprinkler
Q=K sqrt(P)
60= 5.6 sqrt(P)
P =115 psi Ouch please check my math
2000 sq ft / 100 = calc 20 or more heads
sqrt 2000 x 1.2 = 53.7' calc 6 heads on line
.6/2000 = + 1200 gpm probably closer to 1400 gpm
8" main?
150 psi at Riser o
>
>
> https://calendly.com/t_mack_mepcad
>
>
>
> From: Bobby Welch
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2024 4:11:17 PM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Old pipe Schedule system
>
>
>
>
NFPA 13, 2016
12.6.1 For storage applications with densities of 0.2 gpm/ft2 (8.1 mm/min)
or less, standard response
sprinklers with a K-factor of K-5.6 (80) or larger shall be permitted.
12.6.2 For general storage applications, rack storage, rubber tire storage,
roll paper storage,
and baled cott
NK RVT | AlarmCAD
Book appointment time in my calendar
https://calendly.com/t_mack_mepcad
From: Bobby Welch
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2024 4:11:17 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Old pipe Schedule system
I am workin
I am working on a project that looks to be an old pipe scheduled system. the
branch line schedule is 1", 1", 1.25", 1.5", 1.5", 2" and the heads appear to
be ½" 5.6K sprinklers. The spacing is 10' x 10' on the heads. There is a
placard on the riser that states the area was calculated at a 0.60 o
um
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
> On Behalf Of Matthew J Willis
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 7:46 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: RE: Old pipe schedule
>
> Ah.., but the crux is, Are you working there under 25 or 13?
>
&
OUCH, Brad
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
On Behalf Of Matthew J Willis
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 7:46 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Old pipe schedule
Ah.., but the crux is, Are you wor
-
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of Art Tiroly
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:25 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Old pipe schedule
What is the sprinkler spacing?
Staggered spacing was quite common before 1940.
Newer
Protection
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
On Behalf Of Todd Williams
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 7:22 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Old pipe schedule
I am working on a project in a mill that was
Todd, google 'history of fire protection' and look for rules ~1899 I think-
it shows pipe schedule--
Or I could send the pdf when I get to the office 1.5 hours.
Brad
On Mar 16, 2016 6:22 AM, "Todd Williams" wrote:
> I am working on a project in a mill that was constructed in 1884. On the
> t
...@coxfire.com
904-781-8227
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of Todd Williams
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 7:22 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Old pipe schedule
I am working on a project in a
: Old pipe schedule
I am working on a project in a mill that was constructed in 1884. On the
top floor, the branch piping is 3/4 - 1 - 1. Was there an older version of
pipe schedule that allowed smaller pipe or is this just undersized?
Hopefully some of you history buffs (or at least those with a bun
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
> > On Behalf Of Matthew J Willis
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 7:46 AM
> > To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> > Subject:
ler.org] On Behalf Of Art Tiroly
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:25 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: RE: Old pipe schedule
>
> What is the sprinkler spacing?
> Staggered spacing was quite common before 1940.
> Newer heads installed?
> High pressure water
gt; -Original Message-
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
> On Behalf Of Matthew J Willis
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 7:46 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: RE: Old pipe schedule
>
> Ah.., but t
rforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
> On Behalf Of Matthew J Willis
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 7:46 AM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Subject: RE: Old pipe schedule
>
> Ah.., but the crux is, Are you working there under 25 or 13?
>
> R/
> Matt
I am working on a project in a mill that was constructed in 1884. On the
top floor, the branch piping is 3/4 - 1 - 1. Was there an older version of
pipe schedule that allowed smaller pipe or is this just undersized?
Hopefully some of you history buffs (or at least those with a bunch of old
stuf
17 matches
Mail list logo
