I'm trying to create a mapped object where I don't know what the
exact constructor arguments of the object might be. I was trying
to use the inspect module to get the right arguments, but it looks
like the mapper is redefining the original class __init__. Any
thoughts as to how I might
iain duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ridiculous but at least it works. I suppose in the case of a web app the
cron job could even be on any old server using wget.
I'd put the cron job on the same server as the app... :-) The load is
ridiculous and there's no need to have an extra machine
iain duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2007-03-02 at 18:44 -0500, Karl Guertin wrote:
On 2/3/07, iain duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
InvalidRequestError: Given column 'page_article.ordering', attached to
table 'page_article', failed to locate a corresponding column from table
thanks again, Michael.
Stefan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
I am getting the following error when defining a one-to-many relationship
using the following code:
db = create_engine('postgres://postgres:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/eCommerce')
metadata = BoundMetaData(db)
mapperFactory = MapperFactory(metadata)
ProductAward, ProductAwardTable =
On Feb 4, 5:54 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to create a mapped object where I don't know what the
exact constructor arguments of the object might be. I was trying
to use the inspect module to get the right arguments, but it looks
like the mapper is redefining the original
On Sun, 2007-04-02 at 10:33 -0200, Jorge Godoy wrote:
iain duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ridiculous but at least it works. I suppose in the case of a web app the
cron job could even be on any old server using wget.
I'd put the cron job on the same server as the app... :-) The load
OK, i added this in 2298. I dont notice any speed enhancement in
overall performance of the unit tests even though it builds on set
and not sets.Set...this is probably because we dont use OrderedSet
too much. Also i had to make some changes so its compatible with 2.3
(no generator expressions,
well the way out for the moment is to not use reflection since its
screwing up with schemas.
On Feb 4, 1:27 pm, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting the following error when defining a one-to-many relationship
using the following code:
db =
so, I just committed a test for PG reflection across schemas in r2299
and PG foreign key reflection works fine for alternate schema tables,
also works in 0.3.4, and in r2300 i changed it to ensure that auto-
reflection of referenced tables works (which is what you seem to be
looking for with the
three people have replied to this user and nobody has referenced the
documented (as well as FAQ'ed) feature specifically built to deal with
this ?! sorry im so cranky...but man you guys have to help me a
little more :)
use pool_recycle=some number of seconds less than 8 hours on your
On Sun, 2007-04-02 at 22:00 +, Michael Bayer wrote:
three people have replied to this user and nobody has referenced the
documented (as well as FAQ'ed) feature specifically built to deal with
this ?! sorry im so cranky...but man you guys have to help me a
little more :)
use
Not sure if this is the right place, hope so.
In the example for Association Object on
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/datamapping.myt#datamapping
The bottom part reads:
for a in alist:
for k in a.keywords:
if k.keyword.name == 'jacks_stories':
print k.user.user_name
13 matches
Mail list logo
