On Apr 18, 10:43 pm, Randy Syring ra...@rcs-comp.com wrote:
So, this seems like a relatively common paradigm and I was hoping
someone might already know of a library or example application for
using SA to accomplish this. I am looking for something akin to
Rail's acts_as_cutomizable plugin
It looks as though SQLAlchemy doesn't use the startswith() operator
properly in Oracle (using SA 0.6).
col1.startswth(col2) gives me col1 LIKE col2 + '%%' which
should be col1 LIKE col2 || '%%' .
Am I doing something wrong or should this be reported?
Thanks
--
You received this message
Rhett Garber wrote:
This would be much easier, I could potentially be what we go with. I
think this is similar to my 'original implementation'
I just found the syntax to be a bit bothersome since the person
creating the table has to know they are creating two
columns... or not using
Grimsqueaker wrote:
It looks as though SQLAlchemy doesn't use the startswith() operator
properly in Oracle (using SA 0.6).
col1.startswth(col2) gives me col1 LIKE col2 + '%%' which
should be col1 LIKE col2 || '%%' .
Am I doing something wrong or should this be reported?
that looks
Hi,
Is it possible to supply bindparam a clause type?
I want to execute a query of the form
select * from f(:a, :b,:c)
where :b might be either a String or a function.
if :b is a function, i'd like to do something like:
s=select([col1 , col2, col3], from_obj=func.f(bindparam('a'),
Alternatively a possibility to replace a bindparam Expression with
some other Expression would do it too...
2010/4/21 Paul Balomiri paulbalom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Is it possible to supply bindparam a clause type?
I want to execute a query of the form
select * from f(:a, :b,:c)
where :b might
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
Rhett Garber wrote:
This would be much easier, I could potentially be what we go with. I
think this is similar to my 'original implementation'
I just found the syntax to be a bit bothersome since the person
On Apr 21, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Rhett Garber wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com
wrote:
Rhett Garber wrote:
This would be much easier, I could potentially be what we go with. I
think this is similar to my 'original implementation'
I just found the
Rhett Garber wrote:
Oh right, sorry:
class Advertiser(Base):
__tablename__ = advertiser
id, _id = build_id_column('id', primary_key=True)
salesperson_id, _salesperson_id =
build_id_column('salesperson_id', foreign_key=ForeignKey(%s.id %
Salesperson.__tablename__))
