In the 07Migration wiki, there is this line:
Index('name', name=idx_name)
which doesn't work for me. I have to change it to:
Index('idx_name', 'name')
Is it a typo or some python 3 only syntax?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To
Hi folks, hoping someone can help here, couldn't figure it out from
the mapper docs. I have some mappers being created in modules that are
loaded separately. That has to stay that way, essentially our
framework has base modules that get reused and they have ZCA utilities
registered that make
On Apr 22, 2011, at 7:18 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
Hi folks, hoping someone can help here, couldn't figure it out from
the mapper docs. I have some mappers being created in modules that are
loaded separately. That has to stay that way, essentially our
framework has base modules that get reused
On Apr 22, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Yap Sok Ann wrote:
In the 07Migration wiki, there is this line:
Index('name', name=idx_name)
which doesn't work for me. I have to change it to:
Index('idx_name', 'name')
its a typo as an Index only has one name, its the first arg.
Is it a typo or
mappers only support the addition of new attributes after construction.
There is of course clear_mappers() but that removes the entire graph of
mappers (emphasis on graph, which is why we don't get into the surgical
removal of individual mappers). There is also the prospect of creating
On Apr 22, 2011, at 10:16 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
mappers only support the addition of new attributes after construction.
There is of course clear_mappers() but that removes the entire graph of
mappers (emphasis on graph, which is why we don't get into the surgical
removal of
mappers only support the addition of new attributes after construction.
There is of course clear_mappers() but that removes the entire graph of
mappers (emphasis on graph, which is why we don't get into the surgical
removal of individual mappers). There is also the prospect of creating
On Apr 22, 2011, at 10:58 PM, Iain Duncan wrote:
Right, I didn't do a thorough job of explaining it, so I agree with the your
assessment of the monkey patch, but my pattern isn't quite what you described
( because of my poor explanation! ). I'm using Pyramid and taking advantage
of the
