On Saturday 07 December 2013 06:32 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
[...]
OK more or less that, please review my commit at
https://github.com/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/commit/d1cc78479d988bd9acbcf395483d2130b0873b1c
which moves handling of “overflow” into _inc_overflow() and
_dec_overflow() methods - the
Here is the full code:
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
from sqlalchemy import *
from sqlalchemy.orm import relationship, sessionmaker
Base = declarative_base()
product_tags = Table(
'product_tags', Base.metadata,
Column('product_id', Integer,
On Dec 7, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Alexey Vihorev viho...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the full code:
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
from sqlalchemy import *
from sqlalchemy.orm import relationship, sessionmaker
Base = declarative_base()
product_tags = Table(
In my case, table 'tags' is editable by users, so I want to avoid them
deleting a tag that's in use by any product. As it is now, they can delete
the tag and the system just erases all traces of it from all products.
From: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com [mailto:sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com] On
On Dec 7, 2013, at 6:18 PM, Alexey Vihorev viho...@gmail.com wrote:
In my case, table ‘tags’ is editable by users, so I want to avoid them
deleting a tag that’s in use by any product.
deleting….using a SQL DELETE statement directly? If you use real foreign keys
then the database will
