I found a problem in 0.9.1 version:
in 0.8.x :
print (Blog.c.id==5) None
blog.id = :id_1
But in 0.9.1:
print (Blog.c.id==5) None
blog.id = :id_1 AND NULL
So I don't know if it's a bug?
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Jonathan Vanasco jonat...@findmeon.comwrote:
automap sounds neat!
Hi,
First, happy new year to you all and thanks for the great work on
SQLAlchemy.
I just would like to share a bit of news. Cubes – Python Lightweight OLAP
framework is approaching 1.0 with quite a few new things. Cubes is using
SQLAlchemy for the SQL ROLAP backend. The notable SQL related
that’s this:
http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_9/changelog/migration_09.html#improved-rendering-of-boolean-constants-null-constants-conjunctions
On Jan 7, 2014, at 4:13 AM, limodou limo...@gmail.com wrote:
I found a problem in 0.9.1 version:
in 0.8.x :
print (Blog.c.id==5) None
Hi folks,
SQLAlchemy is at the heart of what we do at work (UK based hedge fund); so
first of all a big thank you; I am not quite sure where we'd be without
you. We would like to give back to the community as much as we can (I tried
to get some of the developers on the company xmas present
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Philip Scott safetyfirstp...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi folks,
SQLAlchemy is at the heart of what we do at work (UK based hedge fund); so
first of all a big thank you; I am not quite sure where we'd be without
you. We would like to give back to the community as much
On Jan 7, 2014, at 2:14 PM, Philip Scott safetyfirstp...@gmail.com wrote:
The other bit of technology we have that could be unpicked without _too_ much
trouble is a sort of reverse CompositeProperty; many attributes of different
types, including collections, out of one HSTORE column (with
But I don't know why make this decision. Because where NULL will get
nothing. And in 0.8.X version, I need to combine multiple condition
according user input to one condition, so my code just like:
cond = None
for c in conditions:
cond = c cond
So in 0.9.X, the result will be something
On 08 Jan 2014, at 01:26, limodou limo...@gmail.com wrote:
But I don't know why make this decision. Because where NULL will get
nothing. And in 0.8.X version, I need to combine multiple condition according
user input to one condition, so my code just like:
cond = None
for c in
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 08 Jan 2014, at 01:26, limodou limo...@gmail.com wrote:
But I don't know why make this decision. Because where NULL will get
nothing. And in 0.8.X version, I need to combine multiple condition
according user input
