The tutorial that I do is the same one..for the past few years, so the whole
thing is up at http://www.sqlalchemy.org/library.html#tutorials .
the talk I'm doing, there'll be video of that, sure.
On Apr 1, 2014, at 7:33 PM, nathan wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I really wish I could be there and see
Hi Mike,
I really wish I could be there and see your presentations. They're usually
recorded right? Just checking and hoping it's recorded... and if so, whoever
records it does a great job. :)
https://us.pycon.org/2014/speaker/profile/455/
Introduction to SQLAlchemy
https://us.pycon.org/2014
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> i didn't catch this before...
>
> backref_name = "timeseries_%s" % name ## might be better as an the id
> of the location
> location = relationship('Location', backref=backref(backref_name,
> lazy='dynamic'))
>
> I don't think he c
ah!
i didn't catch this before...
backref_name = "timeseries_%s" % name ## might be better as an the id
of the location
location = relationship('Location',
backref=backref(backref_name, lazy='dynamic'))
I don't think he can do one table. originally i did, but I looked into some
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
> Think about it. You have 2000 individual Python classes all called
> TimeSeries, all referring to a different table. This is the question you
> have to answer (and which I think is going to wind you up back at one
> table):
>
> 1. which one
On Apr 1, 2014, at 6:56 PM, Peter Stensmyr wrote:
> I posted this question on Stack Overflow a few days ago, and got some
> response but nothing that really solves my problem. I'm hoping that I can get
> some more input here. The initial recommendation was to keep all the data in
> two tables
I posted this question on Stack Overflow a few days ago, and got some
response but nothing that really solves my problem. I'm hoping that I can
get some more input here. The initial recommendation was to keep all the
data in two tables (one meta and one data table), but this might become
unwi
On Apr 1, 2014, at 6:07 PM, jjaq...@gmail.com wrote:
> So I have an ORM session that I've called session.begin() on to start a
> transaction.
>
> I found from some other posts that I can get access to postgres COPY command
> via psycopg2's copy_from method.
>
> So a simple test case for my co
So I have an ORM session that I've called session.begin() on to start a
transaction.
I found from some other posts that I can get access to postgres COPY
command via psycopg2's copy_from method.
So a simple test case for my code looks something like this:
session.begin()
session.execute("CREAT
If you have:
class MyTable(base):
pass
You could do
session.query( MyTable ).from_statement()
*
http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_9/orm/query.html#sqlalchemy.orm.query.Query.from_statement
See also:
http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_9/core/tutorial.html#using-text
htt
On Apr 1, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Alex wrote:
> Yeah, its a very frustrating aspect of SQL Server. Anyway, a query that works
> is the following:
>
> SELECT testmodel.id AS testmodel_id, testmodel.flags AS testmodel_flags
> FROM testmodel
> WHERE (testmodel.flags & 1) > 0
>
> I can get sqlalchem
Yeah, its a very frustrating aspect of SQL Server. Anyway, a query that
works is the following:
SELECT testmodel.id AS testmodel_id, testmodel.flags AS testmodel_flags
FROM testmodel
WHERE (testmodel.flags & 1) > 0
I can get sqlalchemy to emit this like so:
session.query(TestModel).filter(TestMo
Hi,
looked over through documentation and couldn't find any info about mapping
from custom sql query to declared object.
I have declared object that will describe my table and run custom SELECT
query with session.execute(SQL_QUERY).
How to map resultproxy (return value) to object.
Tnx.
--
On Apr 1, 2014, at 8:44 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to define a CheckConstraint like this: my_column in ('a', 'b')
> In Alembic I can write: op.create_check_constraint('ck_name', 'table_name',
> sqlalchemy.sql.column('my_column').in_('a', 'b'))
> Using SQLAlchemy I have the pr
On Apr 1, 2014, at 6:34 AM, Alex wrote:
> Hmm, looks like I spoke too soon. Testing against a SQLite database the
> hybrid attribute approach works fine but I'm having some trouble with SQL
> Server. Basically, given the structure that Michael laid out, the following
> query:
>
> model =
Hi,
I want to define a CheckConstraint like this: my_column in ('a', 'b')
In Alembic I can write: op.create_check_constraint('ck_name', 'table_name',
sqlalchemy.sql.column('my_column').in_('a', 'b'))
Using SQLAlchemy I have the problem that the constraint must be defined
when defining the colu
Hmm, looks like I spoke too soon. Testing against a SQLite database the
hybrid attribute approach works fine but I'm having some trouble with SQL
Server. Basically, given the structure that Michael laid out, the following
query:
model = TestModel(
flags=1
)
session.add(model)
17 matches
Mail list logo
