On 09/29/2016 07:52 PM, Wesley Weber wrote:
I have an uncommon use case that might or might not be supported (or
even a good idea):
I have a main, independent project with its own tables. I would like to
keep track of migrations of its database. I will also have several
"plugin" projects,
On 09/29/2016 03:50 AM, Andrea Cassioli wrote:
Hi,
I am working with SQLAlchemy to insert data in a MSSQL database.
Typically we need to make regular insert of say half million rows in few
tables.
Right now I am using Core flavour to make batch insertion via pyodbc and
I have notice that in
I just pushed that and it should close the bitbucket issue.
On 09/29/2016 03:07 AM, pszynk wrote:
I see you already looked into it. Thanks!
W dniu środa, 28 września 2016 20:55:05 UTC+2 użytkownik Mike Bayer napisał:
this is likely use cases that have been untested, if you can file this
On 09/29/2016 01:38 AM, Warwick Prince wrote:
Hi Mike
I would like a little insight into the session object, and the
declarative_base class.
I have a process running many threads, where each thread may be
connected to potentially a different engine/database. If the database
connection
On 09/28/2016 06:48 PM, Seth P wrote:
On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 5:43:04 PM UTC-4, Mike Bayer wrote:
looks incredibly difficult. I'm not really about to have the
resources
to work with a type that awkward anytime soon, unfortunately. If it
could be made to be a
Hi,
I am working with SQLAlchemy to insert data in a MSSQL database. Typically
we need to make regular insert of say half million rows in few tables.
Right now I am using Core flavour to make batch insertion via pyodbc and I
have notice that in the DB trace I have an entry per row
declare @p1
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Jinghui Niu wrote:
> The documentation shows that hybrid_property should used as a decorator,
> like:
> @hybrid_property
> def my_property(self):
> pass
>
>
> What if I wanted to give this hybrid property a name by referring a variable
>
I see you already looked into it. Thanks!
W dniu środa, 28 września 2016 20:55:05 UTC+2 użytkownik Mike Bayer napisał:
>
> this is likely use cases that have been untested, if you can file this
> w/ a complete test case as a bug report on bitbucket we can start
> looking into it.
>
>
> On
Mike,
Thanx for your reply. I'll try out the 3rd option. It would still be better
than updating record by record at object level.
Thanx,
Rajesh
On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 1:59:38 PM UTC+5:30, Rajesh Rolo wrote:
>
> I'm trying to do a bulk update using core SQLAlchemy to a postgres
>