On 6/12/2012, at 5:26 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 6:27 PM, Derek Harland wrote:
Yes
In that case, how does SQL server make the distinction?
If things have an embedded . then SQL server would ideally make the
distinction based on you quoting the database/schema
On 5/12/2012, at 4:30 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Dec 3, 2012, at 10:20 PM, Derek Harland wrote:
The MSSQL dialect in 0.8.x seems to have had many of the reflection methods
changed from something like:
@reflection.cache
def get_view_names(self, connection, schema=None, **kw
The MSSQL dialect in 0.8.x seems to have had many of the reflection methods
changed from something like:
@reflection.cache
def get_view_names(self, connection, schema=None, **kw):
to
@reflection.cache
@_db_plus_owner_listing
def get_view_names(self, connection, dbname,
On 27/11/2012, at 3:01 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Nov 26, 2012, at 2:51 AM, txnaidaa_sqlalchemy wrote:
Hi all,
I have noticed that the DECIMAL type is not rendered with precision or scale:
sa.__version__
'0.7.9'
import sqlalchemy as sa
print sa.NUMERIC(6, 4)
NUMERIC(6, 4)
