I have a small model with a 'json' column called details and several hybrid
properties to abstract getting from it safely:
User(Base):
@hybrid_property
def phone_number_2(self):
return self.details.get('phone_num_2')
However when I use this in a query, in the class context, I get
This worked great, thank you for the help!
On Friday, September 13, 2019 at 11:16:06 AM UTC-4, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019, at 10:46 AM, Gary L wrote:
>
> I have a declarative model as below
>
>
> class User(Base):
> __tablename__
I have a declarative model as below
class User(Base):
__tablename__ = 'users'
__table_args__ = {
'schema':'internal',
'extend_existing': True,
'mustexist': True
}
The table has a column named 'registration_date'. Since I am working with
pandas I'd like
skills, can work independently, strong
oops concept, design exposure, and oracle db exposure via java programming.
Thanks and Regards,
Gurjant Singh - (Gary)
Technical Recruiter
+1 212 389 9503 ext 208
E: gurjant.si...@damcosoft.com
*NY Office: *112 W 34th St, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10120
,
Gurjant Singh - (Gary)
Technical Recruiter
+1 212 389 9503 ext 208
E: gurjant.si...@damcosoft.com
*NY Office: *112 W 34th St, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10120
*NJ Office: *894 Green Street, Suite B, Iselin, NJ 08830
Corporate: www.damcosoft.com
*[image: Description: cid:image002.jpg@01CEDAE3
I found session.close() doesn't close the database connection (by
calling session.close and sleep, then check the network connections),
neither session.connection().close(). How to close the connection
without quit my application?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
session.bind.dispose()
León Domingo
*ender*
*LA FACTORÍA DE SOFTWARE*
Av. Cerro del Águila 7, 2ª planta - S23
28703 S.S. de los Reyes
Madrid
tlf. y fax: 902 01 44 01
*www.ender.es*
On 5 April 2011 07:47, Gary Shi gary...@gmail.com wrote:
I found session.close() doesn't close the database
try:
Perform table transaction
break
except:
rollback
delay
try again to perform table transaction
I'm sure you will get the gist of the above and why. I also set my
isolation_level to READ UNCOMMITED.
Thanks,
Garyc
--- On Thu, 5/6/10, rajasekhar911
Hello,
I'm using SQLAlchemy with sqlite 3.6.23. I would like to know how you set the
transaction isolation_level=immediate.
I think this will help with the deadlocks I was having. Just dont know how to
implement this.
Thanks,
Garyc
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
?
To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, April 27, 2010, 3:30 PM
gary clark wrote:
Hello,
I'm using SQLAlchemy with sqlite 3.6.23. I would like
to know how you set
the transaction isolation_level=immediate.
I think this will help with the deadlocks I was
having. Just dont know
Thanks Michael. I am going to do some more research on SQLAlchemy and how it
handles locks and its interaction with sqlite.
I will try and post my findings next week.
Thanks,
Garyc
--- On Mon, 4/26/10, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
From: Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com
Referential integrity isn't being violated here - SA is nulling the foreign
key before deleting the row it points to. Try adding nullable=False to the
declaration of attivita.cod_specie. That should make it fail in the way you
expect, because SA will no longer be able to null the foreign key.
The pr_PurchaseRequisition_has_CELLS_budget_has_CELLS_costCenter table is
the one that's causing your problem. It has a foreign key to
CELLS_budget_has_CELLS_costCenter.CELLS_budget_ID (and another to
CELLS_costCenter_ID on the same table). Neither of those
two columns are unique. If you add
with ForeignKeyConstraint.
Search for it at
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/metadata.myt.
So there is no solution to get it running with this requirement in
postgresql ? (except defining a new ID but I cannot change the schema)
On 15 Feb., 21:03, Gary Bernhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 2/13/07, vinjvinj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Found the answer:
# a function to create primary key ids
i = 0
def mydefault():
global i
i += 1
return i
This counter is going to start over every time you run your program. The
second time you run it, it's going to start
The Working with Large Collections section in the advanced mapping docs is
probably what you want:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/adv_datamapping.myt#advdatamapping_properties_working
On 2/13/07, Cristiano Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I everyone. I'm pretty new to SQLAlchemy and never done
On 2/13/07, vinjvinj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This counter is going to start over every time you run your program. The
second time you run it, it's going to start creating IDs that already
exist,
You missed my first post, which stated:
I most certainly did. My apologies. :)
I use the
17 matches
Mail list logo