UTC-5, Michael Bayer wrote:
the workaround, or using git master?
Kevin S kevin...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
Yes, that does fix the issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups sqlalchemy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
I apologize up front for not being able to provide a reproducible example
of my problem.
We have built a web app in sqlalchemy for read-only access of our
production database. We are in the process of migrating from one database
architecture (Sybase) to another (Postgres). The goal is to have
Yes, that does fix the issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
I am trying to construct a filter against a table that has two references
to the same child table. But I am completely confused how to go about it.
I've seen lots of examples for using aliases, but I have not been able to
get any to work. So I'll just try to give my example simply, and ask what
I've seen slight variations on this topic, but not exactly what I'm looking
for.
I want to use a column_property (or something like it) to map the existence
of some Child relationship.
Say for example, I have two summary pages in a web app. One for displaying
rows of Parent objects, and one
I don't know that the 3rd party extension does this.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 3, 2014, at 2:52 PM, Kevin S kevin...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Ok, I think I understand some of the reasoning behind not wanting to
implement such a feature. I think this is fine, because I don't need
/DisjointEagerLoading,
which illustrates how to use set_committed_value() which you’ll want to use
if you’re implementing loading.
On Nov 4, 2014, at 7:19 AM, Kevin S kevin...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Yes, I would say that is an acceptable solution to me. My current attempt,
which I
AM, Kevin S kevin...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
I think I've seen this sort of functionality in Hibernate, where it
tries to optimize if you are going to access some lazy loaded property on a
collection of objects. It can load them in batches, as opposed to one query
for every
I think I've seen this sort of functionality in Hibernate, where it tries
to optimize if you are going to access some lazy loaded property on a
collection of objects. It can load them in batches, as opposed to one query
for every object.
So, I'm asking if there is any way to do something like
and the sybase-pyodbc dialects that
suggest why that argument is valid for one, but not the other... Any hints?
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 4:35:51 PM UTC-4, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:07 PM, Kevin S kevin...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Unfortunately, we cannot switch off of Sybase
to NOT grab the
GIL? From my brief reading it sounded like c extensions are supposed to
get around GIL issues, but again I am naive on the subject.
On Sunday, June 16, 2013 1:10:03 PM UTC-4, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Jun 16, 2013, at 12:55 PM, Kevin S kevin...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
I can try
, Kevin S kevin...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
I am running into a problem while developing a flask application using
flask-sqlalchemy. Now, I'm not even 100% sure my problem is sqlalchemy
related, but I don't know how to debug this particular issue.
To start, I have a sybase
I am running into a problem while developing a flask application using
flask-sqlalchemy. Now, I'm not even 100% sure my problem is sqlalchemy
related, but I don't know how to debug this particular issue.
To start, I have a sybase database that I want to see if I can build a
report generating
Setup: I have been learning SQL Alchemy to build a prototype (proof of
concept) Flask app for our internal website. We want to replace our current
site, which is made entirely of slow python CGIs and raw SQL. Our database
(Postgres) is fairly large, but has some unusual table relationships, and
classes to define
them.
On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:48:23 PM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Kevin S kevin...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Setup: I have been learning SQL Alchemy to build a prototype (proof of
concept) Flask app for our internal website. We
': 2, '@param_1': 215}
That does not make sense as SQL and just returns a random marker.
On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:05:26 PM UTC-4, Kevin S wrote:
Thanks. I have it working for the Marker to Reference_Assoc relationship:
Marker.referenceAssocs = relationship(ReferenceAssoc
that referenceAssoc
is not for a marker but for some other type.
It should not bring back any markers.
On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:14:43 PM UTC-4, Kevin S wrote:
Also, is it appropriate to define a backref here? It returns wrong data.
When I get a ReferenceAssoc object and get its marker
17 matches
Mail list logo
