Hello, i am trying to figure out how association_proxy() could be used
in case of regular rather than declarative style definitions. I
can't figure out what can be done to mitigate the issue and hence i
seek help here.
Thanks in advance...
The code below is copy/pasted sample from the official
contract that the *, x, y syntax describes ? or can you
suddenly pass first_name, last_name positionally as well ?
On Aug 5, 2011, at 2:20 AM, Phazorx wrote:
The patch worked on 0.7.0 and i don't get warning from Python (3.2),
so it seem to have addressed the issue correctly.
(Well i
...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
On Jul 29, 2011, at 3:45 AM, Phazorx wrote:
Most of my entities accept various combinations of parameters and it
makes sense for my to use keyword-only pattern of constructors:
class Person(Root_Entity):
def __init__(self, session, *, first_name, last_name):
class
Most of my entities accept various combinations of parameters and it
makes sense for my to use keyword-only pattern of constructors:
class Person(Root_Entity):
def __init__(self, session, *, first_name, last_name):
class Address(Root_Entity):
def __init__(self, session, *, street,
