On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Dane K Barney wrote:
> I have scoured the documentation looking for the preferred way of handling
> ambiguous joins, and it seems to be through use of aliased tables, but I
> still wonder if there's a better way. Intuitively, it seems like
> relationships
I have scoured the documentation looking for the preferred way of handling
ambiguous joins, and it seems to be through use of aliased tables, but I
still wonder if there's a better way. Intuitively, it seems like
relationships hold enough information to make aliased tables unnecessary.
But the
