On 07/19/16 20:37, Burak Arslan wrote:
>
> On 07/19/16 20:19, Burak Arslan wrote:
>> On 07/19/16 19:38, Mike Bayer wrote:
>>> this warning will be removed in 1.1, see
>>> https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/issues/3749
>> That's nice but am I to understand there is no easy way to test this?
On 07/19/2016 01:37 PM, Burak Arslan wrote:
On 07/19/16 20:19, Burak Arslan wrote:
On 07/19/16 19:38, Mike Bayer wrote:
this warning will be removed in 1.1, see
https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/issues/3749
That's nice but am I to understand there is no easy way to test this? I
stil
On 07/19/16 20:19, Burak Arslan wrote:
>
> On 07/19/16 19:38, Mike Bayer wrote:
>> this warning will be removed in 1.1, see
>> https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/issues/3749
> That's nice but am I to understand there is no easy way to test this? I
> still wouldn't prefer generating redundan
On 07/19/16 19:38, Mike Bayer wrote:
> this warning will be removed in 1.1, see
> https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/issues/3749
That's nice but am I to understand there is no easy way to test this? I
still wouldn't prefer generating redundant properties.
Best,
Burak
--
You received thi
On 07/19/2016 08:52 AM, Burak Arslan wrote:
Hi,
Behold this test:
https://github.com/plq/spyne/blob/be189784b02e204b031f25bc748d9236ef7dfc59/spyne/test/test_sqlalchemy.py#L314
This is for Spyne => SQLAlchemy object bridge so please ignore
Spyne-specific stuff in there.
I noticed that this p
Hi,
Behold this test:
https://github.com/plq/spyne/blob/be189784b02e204b031f25bc748d9236ef7dfc59/spyne/test/test_sqlalchemy.py#L314
This is for Spyne => SQLAlchemy object bridge so please ignore
Spyne-specific stuff in there.
I noticed that this produced warning like this:
/home/plq/.local/lib
