On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:58 AM Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> Dear Mike,
>
> Thanks for the very quick implementation! I didn't realise that people would
> make relationships between different Bases, as I assumed that people would
> use these to represent different databases (as we do), between which
Dear Mike,
Thanks for the very quick implementation! I didn't realise that people
would make relationships between different Bases, as I assumed that people
would use these to represent different databases (as we do), between which
there can be no (enforced) relationships. Then it wouldn't
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 11:04 AM Chris Wilson
wrote:
>
> Dear Mr Bayer and SQLAlchemy users,
>
>
>
> We have an issue which probably counts as a feature request rather than a
> bug, because it’s sufficiently esoteric. We need to be able to use some
> Mappers (in one Metadata) while other mappers
Dear Mr Bayer and SQLAlchemy users,
We have an issue which probably counts as a feature request rather than a bug,
because it's sufficiently esoteric. We need to be able to use some Mappers (in
one Metadata) while other mappers (in a different Metadata) are not and cannot
be completely
