[sqlalchemy] Re: [ticket:336] Informix support and some enhancement for oracle and pgsql

2007-03-27 Thread Michael Bayer
ive added the patchfile to the ticket and its part of a long list of things i have to do. On Mar 21, 2007, at 11:56 PM, 张骏 wrote: so, youd just have people using postgres automatically and without any control issue a SAVEPOINT SP after every single statement execution ? what about the

[sqlalchemy] Re: [ticket:336] Informix support and some enhancement for oracle and pgsql

2007-03-21 Thread 张骏
so, youd just have people using postgres automatically and without any control issue a SAVEPOINT SP after every single statement execution ? what about the performance overhead ? what if someone wants to issue SAVEPOINT at some other step, or not at all ? yes,you are right. reject

[sqlalchemy] Re: [ticket:336] Informix support and some enhancement for oracle and pgsql

2007-03-20 Thread junzhang . jn
label length of 18 is very small, we might have to resolve ticket #512 first (makes the truncation size non-global). please check my patch. we add a attribute in dialet for this case. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed

[sqlalchemy] Re: [ticket:336] Informix support and some enhancement for oracle and pgsql

2007-03-20 Thread 张骏
unit tests: - cant remove any unit tests - many of them are commented out here I will check the whole unit tests to fix the comment blocks. - changing identifier names in unit tests to handle informix ident - e maybe, would rather informix skip those the