[sqlalchemy] Re: Database with "audit trail" table

2009-08-22 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Saturday 22 August 2009 01.08:05 David Bolen wrote: > Adrian von Bidder writes: > > Ideas & comments? > > For what it's worth, I'd think that the best sort of audit would be > something done in the database itself, since it would audit any > changes whether done through any interface. Yes and

[sqlalchemy] Re: Database with "audit trail" table

2009-08-21 Thread David Bolen
Adrian von Bidder writes: > Ideas & comments? For what it's worth, I'd think that the best sort of audit would be something done in the database itself, since it would audit any changes whether done through any interface. It depends on the database involved, but for example, in PostgreSQL you

[sqlalchemy] Re: Database with "audit trail" table

2009-08-21 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Friday 21 August 2009 20.35:13 Mike Conley wrote: > You might want to start here > > http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/UsageRecipes/LogVersions Hmm. Sounds like it's the direction I'm interested in. Is this discussed somewhere in a bit more verbose form? I'm quite new to sqla and also to

[sqlalchemy] Re: Database with "audit trail" table

2009-08-21 Thread Mike Conley
You might want to start here http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/UsageRecipes/LogVersions --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegrou