On Sunday 06 January 2008 05:30:04 Michael Bayer wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008, at 9:46 PM, Dave Harrison wrote:
> > Hey Mike,
> >
> > Below is a minimal test case that always produces the below failure
> > for me under 0.4.2 but not under 0.4.1,
>
> OK, its actually something that was "buggy" in 0.4.1
On Jan 4, 2008, at 9:46 PM, Dave Harrison wrote:
> Hey Mike,
>
> Below is a minimal test case that always produces the below failure
> for me under 0.4.2 but not under 0.4.1,
>
OK, its actually something that was "buggy" in 0.4.1 but didnt produce
a symptom, give r4003 a try which fixes this
On Saturday 05 January 2008 03:08:54 Michael Bayer wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Dave Harrison wrote:
> > On Friday 04 January 2008 23:32:21 Alexandre da Silva wrote:
> >>> Is there an easy way of flushing all objects that are categorised
> >>> as new in the session ??
> >>
> >> I think you
On Jan 4, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Dave Harrison wrote:
>
> On Friday 04 January 2008 23:32:21 Alexandre da Silva wrote:
>>> Is there an easy way of flushing all objects that are categorised
>>> as new in the session ??
>>
>> I think you can use session.clear(), it will remove objects from
>> session,
On Friday 04 January 2008 14:44:32 Dave Harrison wrote:
> On Friday 04 January 2008 23:32:21 Alexandre da Silva wrote:
> > > Is there an easy way of flushing all objects that are
> > > categorised as new in the session ??
> >
> > I think you can use session.clear(), it will remove objects from
> >
On Friday 04 January 2008 23:32:21 Alexandre da Silva wrote:
> > Is there an easy way of flushing all objects that are categorised
> > as new in the session ??
>
> I think you can use session.clear(), it will remove objects from
> session, and persistent objects will stay on database.
>
> Att
>
>
> Is there an easy way of flushing all objects that are categorised as
> new in the session ??
I think you can use session.clear(), it will remove objects from
session, and persistent objects will stay on database.
Att
Alexandre
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You receiv
