Thank you, Mike. Hmm... I tried exactly that technique, the last time
I found myself with a similar need, a year or two ago. I seem to
remember it only caused the problem to regress one step farther. But
I must have missed something and will probably give it another shot.
Any suggestions on
its probably easier to use __missing__ - see attached.
On Mar 13, 2011, at 4:26 AM, Eric Ongerth wrote:
Thank you, Mike. Hmm... I tried exactly that technique, the last time
I found myself with a similar need, a year or two ago. I seem to
remember it only caused the problem to regress
Cool! I was unaware of __missing__. Thanks again.
On Mar 13, 10:24 am, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
its probably easier to use __missing__ - see attached.
dict_of_sets_with_default.py
1KViewDownload
On Mar 13, 2011, at 4:26 AM, Eric Ongerth wrote:
Thank you, Mike.
Ah, brilliant! So now I'm analyzing what prevented me from coming up
with that solution before it looks like my problem, or mental
block, was that I was trying to find a magic incantation to allow me
to get the whole dict-of-set behavior defined from the A class, rather
than allowing it to be
On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:20 PM, Eric Ongerth wrote:
So, jek, if you're listening, or anyone else -- is there an already
existing, working implementation of a Dict of Lists or Dict of Sets
collection class?
the association_proxy is always there to flatten the object in the middle of
two
Ach, I did it again... proceeded as if column_mapped_collection and
attribute_mapped_collection provide collection classes that are dicts
of lists. No, they're just dicts of scalar values!
Again and again I need dicts of lists. They seem to really fit the
data that I tend to work with; A's
So, jek, if you're listening, or anyone else -- is there an already
existing, working implementation of a Dict of Lists or Dict of Sets
collection class?
On Mar 10, 1:55 pm, Eric Ongerth ericonge...@gmail.com wrote:
Ach, I did it again... proceeded as if column_mapped_collection and
