Model
class VDCTemplates(DeclarativeBase):
__tablename__='cd_vdc_templates'
id = Column(Unicode(50), primary_key=True)
vdc_id=Column(Unicode(50), ForeignKey('cd_vdc.id',
ondelete=CASCADE))
template_id=Column(Unicode(50),
ForeignKey('cd_account_templates.id',
DBSession.flush()
after the DBSession.add call might be enough.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:48 PM, sajuptpm sajup...@gmail.com wrote:
Model
class VDCTemplates(DeclarativeBase):
__tablename__='cd_vdc_templates'
id = Column(Unicode(50), primary_key=True)
On Jan 10, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Romy wrote:
Not sure what you mean, as I've seen hybrid setups before.
I'm pretty sure if you try to make a foreign key from an InnoDB table to a
MyISAM table, it will fail.
In any case, thanks for helping me narrow this down. I need to decide
whether I'll
One important change here is to change the engine type to InnoDB, otherwise
transactions are entirely meaningless with MySQL.
If I use InnoDB, the end result of used is 0 in all cases. If I don't and
use MyISAM, the end result of used is 1 in all cases, regardless of whether
InviteCode is
Face palm.. missed the forest for the trees.
Does this mean both tables would need to be InnoDB ?
On Jan 10, 7:10 am, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
One important change here is to change the engine type to InnoDB, otherwise
transactions are entirely meaningless with MySQL.
yah MySQL doesn't really operate with a mixture.
On Jan 10, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Romy wrote:
Face palm.. missed the forest for the trees.
Does this mean both tables would need to be InnoDB ?
On Jan 10, 7:10 am, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
One important change here is to
Not sure what you mean, as I've seen hybrid setups before.
In any case, thanks for helping me narrow this down. I need to decide
whether I'll need real transactions here. Despite being an oversight
on my part, do you think perhaps the docs for rollback / commit should
mention DB support ? I did
yeah there's not really enough detail here to produce an explanation, you'd
need to narrow it down into a self-contained test case.
On Jan 9, 2011, at 1:45 AM, Romy wrote:
I believe it's both mapped and present in the session -- the log
output seems to confirm it:
[I 110108 22:40:30
Okay. In assembling a test case I've noticed the following behavior.
When the mapped object is created before the begin(), the bug is
reproducible. When it's created after the begin(), the rollback
happens correctly and the 'bug' disappears. Specifically:
invite_code =
On Jan 9, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Romy wrote:
Okay. In assembling a test case I've noticed the following behavior.
When the mapped object is created before the begin(), the bug is
reproducible. When it's created after the begin(), the rollback
happens correctly and the 'bug' disappears.
I don't really understand that test since its calling first() on a nonexistent
InviteCode (the table is empty), and seems to be testing something about an
IntegrityError on a completely different table so I can't really see what it is
you're trying to achieve.
Below is a test case that
Sorry Michael, 'self-contained' wasn't a proper term for that test
given that it required an initial DB state containing a single row.
I've modified your version to try and reproduce the bug.
Since yours didn't use elixir at all and I'm not familiar with
elixir's internals, I was able to
somethings up with sphinxI rebuilt the docs locally since its not
working on the server for some reason. doc is here:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/reference/orm/sessions.html?highlight=active%20transaction#sqlalchemy.orm.session.Session.is_active
On Feb 1, 2009, at 1:36 PM,
On Oct 15, 11:37 am, Heston James - Cold Beans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick question I hope guys.
If I have an object which contains a bunch of children and cascade is set on
the relationships. When I add the parent object to the session and commit
it, are the children saved as part of a
On Jun 27, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Matt Haggard wrote:
I'm getting a ProgrammingError (I've pasted the last part of the
traceback at the bottom of the page).
The error comes from my first heavy-AJAX page in Pylons (postgres
backend). If I cause too many AJAX requests at a time, or even after
INSERT or UPDATE? I don't do any inserts with this code... only
changing what's already there.
Is an integrity constraint a PG thing, or SQLAlchemy model thing?
And can I do Session.rollback() ?
Thanks!
On Jun 27, 2:19 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 27, 2008, at 4:03 PM,
I've fixed it by calling Session.clear() at the end of every
controller action (it's in __after__()).
I'm gonna go read about what that does -- right now it's just magic as
far as I can tell :)
Thanks again for the help, Michael
On Jun 27, 3:30 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Michael Bayer ha scritto:
On Nov 7, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
I would like this interface to be public, so I can implement it for
the
Engine class in nadbapi.
ok, its public, rev 3751.
Great, thanks.
What about _execute_compiled :-)?
I have just implemented these
I gleaned from your stack trace that youre using
strategy=threadlocal (full test cases are much more helpful).
anyway, its a bug, fixed in r3748.
On Nov 7, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to add support to SQLALchemy 0.4 in nadbapi:
Michael Bayer ha scritto:
I gleaned from your stack trace that youre using
strategy=threadlocal (full test cases are much more helpful).
anyway, its a bug, fixed in r3748.
Thanks, now finally nadbapi works with SQLAlchemy 0.4.
Sorry for not having provided full test cases, I was
On Nov 7, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
Michael Bayer ha scritto:
I gleaned from your stack trace that youre using
strategy=threadlocal (full test cases are much more helpful).
anyway, its a bug, fixed in r3748.
Thanks, now finally nadbapi works with SQLAlchemy 0.4.
Sorry
Michael Bayer ha scritto:
[...]
One last thing.
With SQLAlchemy 0.3.x, my Engine class can be used to execute
implicit
queries.
Now with 0.4.x this does not works, since the engine should implement
additionals methods:
statement_compiler and _execute_clauseelement.
What's the
On Nov 7, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Manlio Perillo wrote:
I would like this interface to be public, so I can implement it for
the
Engine class in nadbapi.
ok, its public, rev 3751.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
23 matches
Mail list logo
