[sqlalchemy] Re: Small note on reading SA docs

2009-05-22 Thread Michael Bayer
Bobby Impollonia wrote: > > I also noticed that your current robots.txt file disallows indexing of > anything under /trac/. It would nice to let google index bugs in trac > so that someone who searches google for sqlalchemy help can come > across an extant bug describing their problem. In addition

[sqlalchemy] Re: Small note on reading SA docs

2009-05-22 Thread Michael Bayer
Bobby Impollonia wrote: > > Rereading what you posted, by "such a prominent place on Google", did > you mean specifically the ".4" and ".3" links that show up below > sqlalchemy when www.sqlalchemy.org is returned in the search results? > Those are what google calls "sitelinks". You can tell them

[sqlalchemy] Re: Small note on reading SA docs

2009-05-22 Thread Michael Bayer
Bobby Impollonia wrote: > >>  otherwise if you have any advice on how to get 0.4/0.3 >> delisted from such a prominent place on Google, that would be >> appreciated. > > The simplest thing to do is to append: > Disallow: /docs/04/ > Disallow: /docs/03/ agreed, this is done. --~--~-~--~-

[sqlalchemy] Re: Small note on reading SA docs

2009-05-22 Thread Benjamin A. Shelton
I've had quite the opposite experience with SQLAlchemy's documentation, and I just started using it for a couple of small projects about two weeks ago. Once I was accustomed to the site layout, it became reasonably easy to find what I was looking for. Specifically, I've been using the integrated s

[sqlalchemy] Re: Small note on reading SA docs

2009-05-22 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Friday 22 May 2009 01.59:13 Michael Bayer wrote: > otherwise if you have any advice on how to get 0.4/0.3 > delisted from such a prominent place on Google, that would be > appreciated. Since removing them entirely is an option for you, perhaps just completely remove them from search engine

[sqlalchemy] Re: Small note on reading SA docs

2009-05-22 Thread semafor
Oh, I was not aware. The 05 docs is, as you say, addressing some of my points. Thanks On May 22, 1:14 am, semafor wrote: > Hi. > > Currently, the documentation for SA is not easy for the eyes. > Usinghttp://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/04/sqlalchemy_engine.htmlas an > example, there are ways to imp

[sqlalchemy] Re: Small note on reading SA docs

2009-05-21 Thread Bobby Impollonia
Rereading what you posted, by "such a prominent place on Google", did you mean specifically the ".4" and ".3" links that show up below sqlalchemy when www.sqlalchemy.org is returned in the search results? Those are what google calls "sitelinks". You can tell them not to use certain pages as siteli

[sqlalchemy] Re: Small note on reading SA docs

2009-05-21 Thread Bobby Impollonia
>  otherwise if you have any advice on how to get 0.4/0.3 > delisted from such a prominent place on Google, that would be > appreciated. The simplest thing to do is to append: Disallow: /docs/04/ Disallow: /docs/03/ to the file: http://www.sqlalchemy.org/robots.txt This tells google (and all we

[sqlalchemy] Re: Small note on reading SA docs

2009-05-21 Thread Michael Bayer
On May 21, 2009, at 7:14 PM, semafor wrote: > > Hi. > > Currently, the documentation for SA is not easy for the eyes. Using > http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/04/sqlalchemy_engine.html as an > example, there are ways to improve this: thats not a good example to choose at all as the documentation