[sqlalchemy] Re: Support for SQL views?

2007-02-17 Thread vinjvinj
Views as normal tables work with mysql. view as a table (using autoload). The application I currently work on --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to

[sqlalchemy] Re: Support for SQL views?

2007-02-17 Thread Paul Johnston
Hi, But I was a bit disappointed when I found that I couldn't access a view as a table (using autoload). The application I currently work on is based on Oracle and uses views heavily. The good news is that it Views work ok for me using MSSQL, although I haven't tried autoload. My gut feel

[sqlalchemy] Re: Support for SQL views?

2007-02-17 Thread Michael Bayer
On Feb 17, 2007, at 6:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I was a bit disappointed when I found that I couldn't access a view as a table (using autoload). The application I currently work on is based on Oracle and uses views heavily. The good news is that it uses a lot of materialized

[sqlalchemy] Re: Support for SQL views?

2007-02-17 Thread Michael Bayer
ive committed the patch for synonym reflection in r2335, corresponding to ticket 379...so a table linked by a synonym should now be reflectable. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To