thanks - but how does that query specify a town?
It seems like that would just return true if the current user had any
town relationships? Or am I reading it wrong?
On Sep 19, 5:46 pm, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 2009, at 11:41 AM, joeformd wrote:
When we
Thanks for the speedy response Michael,
we came up with this:
current_user_has_town = bool(session.query(User).filter
(User.id==current_user.id).filter(User.towns.contains
(current_user)).count())
which maybe has slightly clearer intent?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
On Sep 19, 2009, at 10:19 AM, joeformd wrote:
Thanks for the speedy response Michael,
we came up with this:
current_user_has_town = bool(session.query(User).filter
(User.id==current_user.id).filter(User.towns.contains
(current_user)).count())
which maybe has slightly clearer intent?
When we tried that it made a sql query to get all the towns (towns are
loaded lazily) - that could be an awful lot of information, so this
would be a much faster query
On Sep 19, 4:33 pm, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 2009, at 10:19 AM, joeformd wrote:
Thanks for
On Sep 19, 2009, at 11:41 AM, joeformd wrote:
When we tried that it made a sql query to get all the towns (towns are
loaded lazily) - that could be an awful lot of information, so this
would be a much faster query
so, the most succinct (and efficient) query of all is
On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:44 PM, joeformd wrote:
Is there a simple way in SQLA to check if a relationship exists
between two rows in a many-to-many situation, where the relationship
is defined using another table?
eg. the join table might look like this:
user_towns = Table('user_towns',
