On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Jon Nelson wrote:
>
>> File "pg8000/protocol.py", line 121, in serialize
>> val = struct.pack("!i", len(val) + 4) + val
>> UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0x8d in position
>> 3: ordinal
On Nov 7, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Jon Nelson wrote:
> File "pg8000/protocol.py", line 121, in serialize
>val = struct.pack("!i", len(val) + 4) + val
> UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0x8d in position
> 3: ordinal not in range(128)
make sure you're on the latest tip of pg8000,
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Jon Nelson wrote:
>
> have you asked about this on the psycopg2 mailing list ? its at
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
> . Let me know if you do, because I'll get out the popcorn...
On Nov 7, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Jon Nelson wrote:
>>
>> have you asked about this on the psycopg2 mailing list ? its at
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>> . Let me know if you do, because I'll get out the popcorn... :)
>
> That's the python list.
oops:
http://lists.ini
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
>> Before I even posted I resorted to strace. strace immediately
>> confirmed my suspicion - when using psycopg2 I don't see one big fat
>> INSERT with lots of binds, I see one INSERT per bind, and it's this
>> that is ultimately killing the pe
Heyho!
On Friday 06 November 2009 02.46:11 Jon Nelson wrote:
> ... was performing an individual
> INSERT for every single row.
Don't know sqlalchemy good enough, but for big bulk imports on the SQL side,
shouldn't "COPY" be used? Which is as far as I know pg-specific / non-SQL
standard.
chee
On Nov 5, 8:40 pm, Michael Bayer wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Jon Nelson wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I recently ran into an issue today where batched (inside a
> > transaction) I was able to achieve not more than about 9000
> > inserts/second to a postgresql database (same machine running the
>
On Nov 5, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Jon Nelson wrote:
>
> I recently ran into an issue today where batched (inside a
> transaction) I was able to achieve not more than about 9000
> inserts/second to a postgresql database (same machine running the
> test).
>
> With everything exactly the same, I was able
