On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:58 PM, kk krm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2015 10:05 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Mike Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com
wrote:
On 8/7/15 11:05 AM, kk wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2015 03:03 PM, Ladislav Lenart wrote:
Hello.
Hello,
Tahnks to you and Mike for detaild insight, My questions follow
in-line.On Friday 07 August 2015 08:48 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:05 PM, kk krm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2015 03:03 PM, Ladislav Lenart wrote:
Hello.
ORM is certainly slower. How
Hi,
I have gone through the documentation for baked queries.
It sounds interesting and I guess the performance boost is surely going
to be worth noticing.
I just wished to ask one thing, if there are series of queries firing
with each one of them bringing back bulk recordsets, will this
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:42 PM, kk krm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Tahnks to you and Mike for detaild insight, My questions follow in-line.On
Friday 07 August 2015 08:48 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:05 PM, kk krm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2015 03:03 PM,
On Tuesday 11 August 2015 03:44 AM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:42 PM, kk krm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Tahnks to you and Mike for detaild insight, My questions follow in-line.On
Friday 07 August 2015 08:48 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:05 PM, kk
On Monday 10 August 2015 10:36 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:58 PM, kk krm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2015 10:05 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Mike Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com
wrote:
On 8/7/15 11:05 AM, kk wrote:
On Friday
On Friday 07 August 2015 10:05 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Mike Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
On 8/7/15 11:05 AM, kk wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2015 03:03 PM, Ladislav Lenart wrote:
Hello.
ORM is certainly slower. How much depends A LOT on your
Dear all,
I am planning to totally revamp my rdbms model and totally migrate to
sqlalchemy.
Right now we have a lot of stored procedurs for obvious performance
benefits. However it is becoming more and more difficult to maintain
the system and also difficult to migrate existing users when
Hello.
ORM is certainly slower. How much depends A LOT on your workload. For example
bulk operations with ORM are an order of magnitude slower than raw SQL. On the
other hand, SQLAlchemy Core let's you write generative SQL queries without ORM
features which are as performant as raw SQL. Overall
On Friday 07 August 2015 03:03 PM, Ladislav Lenart wrote:
Hello.
ORM is certainly slower. How much depends A LOT on your workload. For example
bulk operations with ORM are an order of magnitude slower than raw SQL. On the
other hand, SQLAlchemy Core let's you write generative SQL queries
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:05 PM, kk krm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2015 03:03 PM, Ladislav Lenart wrote:
Hello.
ORM is certainly slower. How much depends A LOT on your workload. For
example
bulk operations with ORM are an order of magnitude slower than raw SQL. On
the
other
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Mike Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
On 8/7/15 11:05 AM, kk wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2015 03:03 PM, Ladislav Lenart wrote:
Hello.
ORM is certainly slower. How much depends A LOT on your workload. For
example
bulk operations with ORM are an order
On 8/7/15 11:05 AM, kk wrote:
On Friday 07 August 2015 03:03 PM, Ladislav Lenart wrote:
Hello.
ORM is certainly slower. How much depends A LOT on your workload. For
example
bulk operations with ORM are an order of magnitude slower than raw
SQL. On the
other hand, SQLAlchemy Core let's
13 matches
Mail list logo
