Re: [sqlalchemy] implementing implicit scalar collections

2013-05-28 Thread Burak Arslan
Hi Mike, On 05/25/13 17:59, Michael Bayer wrote: Your primary key is far from useless. If your collection consists of unique values, then that's your primary key. If your collection consists of non-unique values, but are unique to their parent, then again, that's your primary key (a

Re: [sqlalchemy] implementing implicit scalar collections

2013-05-25 Thread Michael Bayer
On May 22, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Burak Arslan burak.ars...@arskom.com.tr wrote: Hi, I've just implemented support for scalar collections for Spyne. (In Spyne terms that's sql serialization of an array of primitives). Seems to be working fine so far. The question is: Is the association

[sqlalchemy] implementing implicit scalar collections

2013-05-24 Thread Burak Arslan
Hi, I've just implemented support for scalar collections for Spyne. (In Spyne terms that's sql serialization of an array of primitives). Seems to be working fine so far. The question is: Is the association proxy the only (read/write) way of doing this? It requires the child table to be

[sqlalchemy] implementing implicit scalar collections

2013-05-23 Thread Burak Arslan
Hi, I've just implemented support for scalar collections for Spyne. (In Spyne terms that's sql serialization of an array of primitives). Seems to be working fine so far. The question is: Is the association proxy the only (read/write) way of doing this? It requires the child table to be