Hi All,
As part of looking into #1919, I see that if a table of the same name as
the one passed to tometadata already exists in the destination metadata,
then the table object passed in is ignored and the one already there is
returned.
That feels wrong to me. In the event there's already a
On Sep 16, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
As part of looking into #1919, I see that if a table of the same name as the
one passed to tometadata already exists in the destination metadata, then the
table object passed in is ignored and the one already there is returned.
On 16/09/2010 20:26, Michael Bayer wrote:
As such, I'd expect an exception to be raised rather than the other table
object being returned. What do people feel about this?
Im fine with tometadata raising for 0.7. a warning for 0.6 perhaps.
Cool, done for 0.6. Where should I make the
